Preview

Bulletin of the Khalel Dosmukhamedov Atyrau University

Advanced search

SME DEVELOPMENT IN POST-SOVIET CENTRAL ASIA: THE CASE OF KAZAKHSTAN AND UZBEKISTAN

https://doi.org/10.47649/vau.26.v81.i2.20

Abstract

This article examines the development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in post-Soviet Central Asia, focusing on Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Contrary to the dominant interpretation promoted by international organizations, which emphasizes taxes, corruption, and bureaucratic inefficiencies as the main barriers to SMEs, this study uncovers a different set of underlying challenges. The aim of the study is to identify and analyze the key operational, institutional, and contextual factors shaping the development of small and medium-sized enterprises in post-Soviet Central Asia, with a focus on Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, taking into account the specific characteristics of the local business environment and the everyday operating conditions of enterprises. Drawing on in-depth interviews and media content analysis, the research identifies key operational barriers that remain largely overlooked. These findings reveal that, beyond institutional and regulatory constraints, everyday operational realities significantly shape SME development in the region. The analysis is based on the Institutional Theory and Contextual Dependence Theory, which together explain how formal institutions, historical legacies, and local contextual factors shape SME operations in different environments. By presenting qualitative evidence from Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, the study provides a deeper understanding of the structural and contextual factors influencing SMEs in post-Soviet economies. The obtained conclusions expand the scientific understanding of entrepreneurship in countries with a transition economy and can be used in the development of a state policy to support SMEs, taking into account regional specifics, real operational needs of business and the peculiarities of the institutional environment.

About the Author

A. Kenzhetayeva
Bluefield State University
United States

Ainur Kenzhetayeva – PhD in Political Science, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Department of Social Science,

Bluefield, West Virginia



References

1. Taiwo J.N., Ayodeji A.M., Yusuf B.A. Impact of small and medium enterprises on economic growth and development. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. — Vol. 2(6). — 2012. — P. 1–13. [in English]

2. Leegwater A., Shaw A. The Role of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Economic Growth: A CrossCountry Regression Analysis (USAID Micro Report No. 135). — Washington: United States Agency for International Development. — 2008. — 121 p. [in English]

3. Vijayakumar S. The Trend and Impact of Small and Medium Enterprises on Economic Growth in Sri Lanka. International Journal on Global Business Management and Research. — Vol. 1(2). — 2013. — P. 27–39. [in English]

4. Chinweuba E.T., Sunday C.O. Quantitative Analysis of the Impact of Small and Medium Scale Enterprises on the Growth of Nigerian Economy (1993–2011). International Journal of Development and Emerging Economics. — Vol. 3(1). — 2015. — P. 26–38. [in English]

5. OECD. Enhancing Competitiveness in Central Asia: SME and Entrepreneurship Policy in Kazakhstan 2018: OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship. — Paris: OECD Publishing. — 2018. — 180 p. [in English]

6. Department of the Bureau of National Statistics of Almaty. Demographic Yearbook of Almaty City. — Astana: Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan. — 2022. — 180 p. [in English]

7. Statistics Agency under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The Volume of the Main Indicators of Small Business and Private Entrepreneurship in the Sectors of the Economy. [Electronic resource]. — URL: https://stat.uz/ru/ofitsialnaya-statistika/small-business-and-entrepreneurship [in English] (accessed: 05.11.2022).

8. Nizaeva M., Coskun A. Determinants of the Financial Constraint and Its Effects on SME Growth in Central Asia. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics. — Vol. 14(27). — 2021. — P. 1–28. [in English]

9. Nizaeva M. Regulatory and Institutional Factors Driving Small Firms' Growth in Central Asia. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics. — Vol. 17(34). — 2024. — P. 167–184. [in English]

10. Pyagay A., Tatikova A., Medeni T. Contradictions and Patterns of Eco-Innovative Strategies of SMEs in Central Asian Countries: Ambivalent Dynamics of Kazakhstan. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. — Vol. 14(1). — 2025. [in English]

11. Elshibaev R.K. Current State and Directions of Small and Medium-Sized Business Development in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Turan University Bulletin. — № 3. — 2021. — Р. 85–94. [in English]

12. Bokayev B., Issenova A. Innovative Strategies of Development of Small and Medium Enterprises in Kazakhstan. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal. — Vol. 27(1). — 2022. [in English]

13. North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. — 1990. — 156 p. [in English]

14. Scott W.R. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. 4th ed. — Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. — 2014. — 56 p. [in English]

15. Hoskisson R.E., Eden L., Lau C.M., Wright M. Strategy in Emerging Economies. Academy of Management Journal. — Vol. 43(3). — 2000. — P. 249–267. [in English]

16. Peng M.W., Sun S.L., Pinkham B., Chen H. The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives. — Vol. 23(3). — 2009. — P. 63–81. [in English]

17. Bruton G.D., Ahlstrom D., Li H.L. Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship: Where Are We Now and Where Do We Need to Move in the Future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. — Vol. 34(3). — 2010. — P. 421–440. [in English]

18. Thornton P.H., Ocasio W., Lounsbury M. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. — Oxford: Oxford University Press. — 2012. — 110 p. [in English]

19. Berry A., Rodriguez E., Sandee H. Small and Medium Enterprise Dynamics in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies. — Vol. 37(3). — 2001. — P. 363–384. [in English]

20. Spector R.A. Order at the Bazaar: Power and Trade in Central Asia. — Ithaca: Cornell University Press. — 2017. — 120 p. [in English]

21. Özcan G. Building States and Markets: Enterprise Development in Central Asia. — London: Palgrave Macmillan. — 2010. — 87 p. [in English]

22. Pomfret R. The Central Asian Economies Since Independence. — Princeton: Princeton University Press. — 2006. — 145 p. [in English]

23. Blanchard O. The Economics of Post-Communist Transition. — Oxford: Clarendon Press. — 1997. — 250 p. [in English]

24. World Bank. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Project Appraisal Document on a Proposed Loan in the Amount of US$40 Million to the Republic of Kazakhstan for an SME Competitiveness Project (Report No. PAD956). [Electronic resource]. — URL: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/120501468253491149/pdf/PAD9560PAD0P14010Box385412B00OUO0 90 .pdf [in English] (accessed: 05.11.2025).

25. Yoshino N., Taghizadeh-Hesary F. Major Challenges Facing Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Asia and Solutions for Mitigating Them. ADBI Working Paper Series. — Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. — 2016. — 136 p. [in English]

26. Baxter P., Jack S. Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report. — Vol. 13(4). — 2008. — P. 544–559. [in English]

27. Yusupov Y. Agrarnyi sektor Uzbekistana: osobennosti, kliuchevye problemy, neobkhodimost reform. [Agricultural sector of Uzbekistan: characteristics, key problems, and the need for reforms]. [[Electronic resource]. — URL: https://cabar.asia/ru/agrarnyj-sektor-uzbekistana-osobennosti-klyuchevye-problemy-neobhodimost-reform [in Russian] (accessed: 05.11.2025).

28. Moskovchuk A. Chetyre osnovnykh problemy v agrobiznese Kazakhstana vyiavil analitik [An analyst identified four major problems in Kazakhstan's agribusiness] [Electronic resource]. — URL: https://www.zakon.kz/redaktsiiazakonkz/4937100-4-osnovnyh-problem-v-agrobiznese.htm [in Russian] (accessed: 05.11.2025).

29. Buianov S. Izmenenie klimata v Kazakhstane b'et po fermeram [Climate change in Kazakhstan affects farmers]. [Electronic resource]. — URL: https://kapital.kz/economic/70256/izmeneniye-klimata-v-kazakhstane-b-yet-pofermeram.html [in Russian] (accessed: 05.11.2025).

30. Ishekenova B. V Kazakhstane est problemy s personalom, a gosudarstvennye proekty realizuiutsia tolko dlia vida – Batalov. [Kazakhstan has personnel problems, and state projects are implemented only for appearance, says Batalov]. [Electronic resource]. — URL: https://lsm.kz/batalov-o-biznese [in Russian] (accessed: 05.11.2025).


Review

For citations:


Kenzhetayeva A. SME DEVELOPMENT IN POST-SOVIET CENTRAL ASIA: THE CASE OF KAZAKHSTAN AND UZBEKISTAN. Bulletin of the Khalel Dosmukhamedov Atyrau University. 2026;81(2):252-263. https://doi.org/10.47649/vau.26.v81.i2.20

Views: 0

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2077-0197 (Print)
ISSN 2790-332X (Online)