METHODS OF USING DIGITAL EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES FOR STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS IN PRIMARY SCHOOL

This article examines the potential of using digital educational resources to teach primary school students with special educational needs. The relevance of the study is determined by the development of inclusive education and the rapid digitalization of the educational environment. In modern educational systems, digital technologies play an important role in ensuring equal access to education and improving the quality of the learning process. The purpose of the study is to analyze the pedagogical potential of digital educational resources and determine their impact on the effectiveness of teaching students with special educational needs in primary school. The methodological basis of the study includes the analysis of scientific literature, comparative analysis of digital educational platforms, pedagogical observation, and generalization of pedagogical experience. The study examined the most common digital educational resources used in inclusive education, including interactive platforms, multimedia materials, and game-based technologies. The results of the study demonstrate that the use of digital educational resources increases student motivation, enhances cognitive activity, and improves understanding of the material. It has been established that interactive educational platforms enable teachers to adapt learning materials to students' individual educational needs and to organize the educational process more effectively. Primary school teachers can use the study's results to develop methodological approaches to organizing inclusive education using digital technologies.

1. Florian L., Black-Hawkins K. (2011) Exploring inclusive pedagogy // Cambridge Journal of Education. Vol. 41. No. 4. P. 813-828. Available at – URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096 [in English] (accessed: 4.03.2026)

2. Hall T.E., Meyer A., Rose D.H. (2012) Universal design for learning in the classroom: Practical applications. – New York: Guilford Press. 156 p. [in English]

3. Mayer R.E. (2009) Multimedia learning. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. 304 p. [in English]

4. Schindler L.A., Burkholder G.J., Morad O.A., Marsh C. (2017) Computers in education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education. Vol. 113. P. 164-182. Available at – URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0 [in English] (accessed: 4.03.2026)

5. Siemens G. (2005) Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 3-10. [in English]

6. Means B., Toyama Y., Murphy R., Baki M. (2013) The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A metaanalysis // Teachers College Record. Vol. 115. No. 3. P. 1-47. [in English]

7. Nurbekova Z., Nurbekov B. (2023) Digitalization of the Education System in Kazakhstan: Experience, Problems, and Perspectives. Strategies for Policy in Science and Education. Vol. 31. No. 4s. P. 218-226. [in English]

8. Qazaqstan Respublikasynda mektepke deiıngı, orta, tehnikalyq jäne käsıptık bılım berudı damytudyñ 2023-2029 jyldarğa arnalğan tūjyrymdamasy. Qazaqstan Respublikasy Ükımetınıñ 2023 jylğy 28 nauryzdağy №249 qaulysy. [Concept for the development of preschool, secondary, technical and vocational education in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2023-2029. Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated March 28, 2023 No. 249.] [in Kazakh]

9. Ainscow M. (2005) Developing inclusive education systems: What are the levers for change? Journal of Educational Change. Vol. 6. P. 109-124. [in English]