STRATEGIC BENCHMARKS FOR THE TRANSITION TO THE TRIPLE HELIX 2.0 MODEL IN KAZAKHSTAN: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

The object of this article's research is the conceptual model of the Triple Helix by Itzkovich and Leydesdorff, which examines the interaction among universities, business, and government and situates it in the context of digital transformation and the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI). In this regard, the study aimed to analyze and evaluate the manifestation of sustainability within the classical "triple helix" in the context of the digital transformation of the economy and the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI). The dynamics of innovative development in the 21st century have shown that evolutionary shifts are taking place in economic thought regarding the role of the “triple helix” concept in the digital economy and the acceptability of its criteria for modeling in multi-level ecosystems. It proposes a digital economy that is acceptable in these conditions. conceptual interpretation of the model Triple Helix, creating a foundation for sustainable technological progress. The study proposes an expanded Triple Helix 2.0 model that accounts for the impact of digitalization and AI as catalysts for the innovation process, accelerating interactions among key actors in the innovation ecosystem. Particular attention is paid to the application of this model in Kazakhstan and to its adaptation to the conditions of the digital economy, as well as to identifying challenges, such as the insufficient development of venture capital and problems with technology transfer. The integration of digital technologies and AI is expected to improve the effectiveness of trilateral interactions, creating conditions for the formation of sustainable innovation clusters. The article explores the possibilities of implementing AI to accelerate innovative development in Kazakhstan. The work includes an analysis of international experience with the Triple Helix model and its adaptation in countries with developed and developing economies. It emphasizes that for the successful implementation of the Triple Helix 2.0 model, Kazakhstan will need to create sustainable innovation clusters, develop scientific and educational infrastructure, and strengthen the state's role in creating conditions for innovative growth. In conclusion, the integration of digital technologies and AI is a key element in creating adaptive, sustainable innovation ecosystems that foster economic and social progress.

1. Poslaniya Glavy gosudarstva K.K. Tokaeva narodu Kazahstana ot 8 sentyabrya 2025 goda «Kazahstan v epohu iskusstvennogo intellekta: aktual'nye zadachi i ih resheniya cherez cifrovuyu transformaciyu». ["Kazakhstan in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Current Challenges and Solutions through Digital Transformation"] — Available at: URL: https://www.akorda.kz/ru/poslanie [in Russian] (accessed: 09.10.2025)

2. Dnishev F.M., Gabdulina A.S. Predposylki i usloviya formirovaniya modeli «trojnoj spirali» innovacij v Kazahstane. [Prerequisites and conditions for the formation of the "triple helix" model of innovation in Kazakhstan]// Economics. – 2018. – № 3(47). – P. 43–55. [in Russian]

3. Nurtaeva D.K., Nurmuhanova G.Zh., Bugubaeva R.O., Begezhanov B.A., Bespaeva R.S. Predprinimatel'skie universitety i innovacii [Entrepreneurial universities and innovations] // Central Asian Economic Review. -2019. – № 2(125). – P. 172–181. [in Russian]

4. Hodzhaev P.D., Nurdinov B.H. Infrastrukturnoe obespechenie innovacionnogo razvitiya regiona [Infrastructural support for the innovative development of the region] // Ekonomika.-2019. – № 1. – P. 178–183. [in Russian]

5. Zashchitina E.K. Vozmozhnosti ispol'zovaniya modeli trojnoj spirali innovacij v stranah Central'noj Azii [The possibilities of using the triple helix model of innovation in Central Asian countries] // Ekonomika Central'noj Azii. - 2023. – T. 7, № 4. – P. 363–378. [in Russian]

6. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix – University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development. EASST Review. 1995. – P. 110–120. [in English]

7. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy. 2000. – Vol. 29, № 2–3. – P. 109–123. [in English]

8. Bayh–Dole Act. U.S. Code, Title 35 – Patents. 1980. – P. 9–23. [in English]

9. Wong P.K., Ho Y.P., Singh A. Towards an “Entrepreneurial University” model to support knowledge-based economic development: the case of NUS. World Development. 2007. – P. 95–103. [in English]

10. Gassmann O., Sandmeier P., Wecht C.H. Extreme innovation: Innovation management in the German automotive industry. R&D Management. 2006. – P. 905–913. [in English]

11. Triple helix dynamics of South Korea’s innovation system: a network analysis of inter-regional technological collaborations. Quality & Quantity. 2017. – P. 51–53. [in English]

12. Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations in Biotechnology Cluster: the case of Singapore // Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea. 2022. – № 17(4). – P. 801–816. [in English]

13. Tao Zhuang. University–industry–government triple helix relationship and regional innovation efficiency in China. Growth and Change. 2020. – 52 p. [in English]

14. Radosevic S. Innovation Systems in Transition Economies: From Theory to Practice. Edward Elgar. 2019. – 60 p. [in English]

15. Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F.J. Mode 3 and Quadruple Helix: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management. 2019. – 55 p. [in English]

16. Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F.J. Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix Models of Innovation. Journal of Knowledge Economy. 2020. – P. 23–24. [in English]

17. OECD. Digital Economy Outlook 2020. Paris: OECD Publishing. 2020. – P. 55–58. [in English]

18. European University Association. Universities and the Digital Transformation. Brussels. – 2019. – P. 115–120. [in English]

19. Kichatinova E.L., Olejnikov I.V. Koncepciya «chetvernoj spirali» i innovacionnoe razvitie regionov // Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. [The concept of the "quadruple spiral" and the innovative development of the regions // Izvestiya Irkutsk State University. The Political Science series. Religious studies] 2019. – T. 29. – P. 53–62. [in Russian]

20. Leydesdorff L., Etzkowitz H. The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy. 2018. – P. 25–35. [in English]

21. Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, ..., and an N-Tuple of Helices // Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2012. – Vol. 3, № 5. – P. 25–35. [in English]

22. Metcalfe A.S. Examining the Trilateral Networks of the Triple Helix // Critical Sociology. 2010. – Vol. 36, № 4. – P. 503–519. [in English]

23. Haritonov A.S. Teoriya simmetrii haosa i poryadka [Theory of symmetry of chaos and order] // Science and Education. – 2014. – Vol. 17. – P. 151–154. [in Russian]

24. Smorodinskaya N.V. Globalizirovannaya ekonomika: ot ierarhij k setevomu ukladu. [The globalized economy: from hierarchies to a network structure] M.: IE RAN. – 2015. – 344 p. [in Russian]

25. Smorodinskaya N.V. Innovacionnaya ekonomika: ot ierarhij k setevomu ukladu [Innovative economy: from hierarchies to a network structure] // Vestnik IE RAN. – 2023. – № 2. – P. 87–111. [in Russian]