DEVELOPING THE LINGUODIDACTIC POTENTIAL OF FUTURE PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS THROUGH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES

The development of the linguodidactic potential of future primary school teachers using innovative technologies is a pressing issue aimed at improving the quality of training that prepares teachers to effectively address the problems of teaching and educating primary school students. In the context of the modern educational process, which requires the use of new technologies, it is necessary to adapt and implement innovative methods for training teachers, thereby enhancing their professional competencies. The purpose of the study is to analyze and develop methodological approaches to the use of innovative technologies to improve the linguodidactic potential of future primary school teachers. This will create conditions for more effective teaching of language disciplines and the development of speech and communication skills in children. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to update pedagogical technologies to support the development of future teachers' linguistic competence. The introduction of innovative technologies into the educational process for primary school teachers improves their ability to teach children, taking into account the individual characteristics of each student and integrating modern teaching methods within the framework of the general goals of the educational standard. In addition, the use of technologies such as multimedia, interactive whiteboards, computer programs, electronic educational resources, and other tools opens new opportunities for the effective acquisition of language disciplines. The novelty of the study lies in its methodological basis for integrating innovative technologies into the linguodidactic training of future primary school teachers. A special feature of this approach is the attention to the use of technologies to develop students' skills in working with new educational tools.

1. Bates A. W. Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning (2nd ed.). Vancouver: Tony Bates Associates Ltd. 2020. P. 112-114.

2. Becker H. J. Educational Technology and Teacher Education Annual 2021. Eugene: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. 2021. P. 26–35.

3. Brown M., Green T. The Essentials of Instructional Design: Connecting Fundamental Principles with Process and Practice. Routledge. 2019. P. 98-107.

4. Christensen C. M., Horn, M. B., Johnson C. W. Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. 2020. P. 275-285.

5. Garrison D. R., Anderson T. E. Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. 2020. P. 73-87.

6. Hattie J. Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. Routledge. 2020. P. 98 – 121.

7. Johnson D. W., Johnson, R. T., Holubec E. J. Cooperation in the Classroom (9th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. 2019. P. 25 – 38.

8. Kolb D. A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (2nd ed.). Pearson. 2019. P.15-28.

9. Merrill M. D. First Principles of Instruction: Identifying and Designing Effective, Efficient, and Engaging Instruction. Wiley. 2020. 1(1). P. 34 – 43.

10. Puentedura R. R. SAMR: A Model for Transforming Teaching and Learning. EdTechTeacher. 2020. P. 56–75.

11. Siemens G. Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning . 2019. 6(1). P. 150-168.

12. Steed A. M. Blended Learning : Research Perspectives, Volume 2. Routledge. 2021. P. 235-255.

13. Thomas M. The Impact of Digital Learning Platforms on Education in the 21st Century. Journal of Educational Technology. 2020. 35(3). P.120-130.

14. Trilling B., Fadel C. 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Jossey-Bass. 2020. P.184 -218.

15. Vaill P. B. Learning as a Way of Being: Strategies for Survival in a World of Permanent Whitewater. JosseyBass. 2020. P. 98-137.

16. Willms D. Strengthening Education through Technology and Innovation. Educational Policy Analysis. 2021. 29(2). P. 215-231.