NATO’S SECURITY STRATEGIES WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF NONMILITARY TACTICS

NATO’s non-military strategies encompass a range of approaches to address security challenges without direct military intervention. These strategies aim to enhance cooperation with neutral states and transform them from security consumers to providers, strengthening regional stability. Integrating military and non-military forces against hybrid threats is also crucial, underscoring the necessity for a comprehensive approach that encompasses political, economic, and social dimensions. In this context, the Strategic Concepts introduced by NATO in 2010 and 2022 outlined various non-military approaches to combat challenges such as terrorism, cyber threats, and energy security. This shift highlights the need for a more comprehensive strategy that extends beyond traditional military methodologies. It acknowledges the growing importance of non-military tactics within the alliance’s framework in addressing contemporary security concerns. NATO’s dynamic, evolving strategy integrates a range of non-military tactics that prioritise governance, political cohesion, and technological advances to address modern security threats effectively. Instead of relying solely on top-down directives, the emphasis is on bottom-up strategies that involve grassroots-level participation in legitimate decision-making processes. This inclusive methodology is evident in NATO’s strategic approaches, which encompass non-military measures to reduce conflicts and establish sustainable governance frameworks. Beyond traditional military constraints, NATO actively supports key diplomatic, political, economic, and technological initiatives to holistically address regional stability, security, and energy security threats. The purpose of the article is to analyze the evolution of NATO's non-military strategies based on a comparative analysis of the 2010 and 2022 Strategic Concepts, and to identify the effectiveness of an integrated "bottom-up" approach in countering hybrid threats, terrorism, and energy security challenges.

1. Chitadze N. Geopolitics, National, and Military Strategy. N. Chitadze (Ed.), The Russia-Ukraine War and Its Consequences on the Geopolitics of the World, IGI Global, 2023. Р. 20–45. Available at: - URL: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8521-7.ch002 [in English] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

2. Devlen B. Grand Strategy in Theory and Practice: The Need for an Effective American Foreign Policy, By William C. Martel, International Affairs, 91(4), 2015. Р. 924–925. Available at: - URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12384 [in English] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

3. Jamison J.F., et Marines, U.S. Marines Writing The Last Chapter First: Operational Commanders And The 'Steady State', Joint Military Operations Department, 2002. Available at: - URL: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA409156 [in English] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

4. Zagdsuren B. The Changes in Ensuring The Military Security Actions, International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 2024. 2 (42), Available at: - URL: https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/ [in English] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

5. Sarjito A. Enhancing National Security: Strategic Policy Development in Defense Management. Jurnal Pelita Nusantara: Kajian Ilmu Sosial Multidisiplin, 2024. 2(1), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.59996/jurnalpelitanusantara.v2i1.524 [in English] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

6. Waltz K. Uluslararası Politikanın Değişen Yapısı, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2008. 5(17), Р.3-44. [in Turkish]

7. Girgin K. Yüzyıl Perspektifinde Dünya Siyaseti, Okumuş Adam Yayıncılık. 2002. 21.Р.30-54. [in Turkish]

8. Kantarcı Ş., Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Uluslararası Sistem: Yeni Sürecin Adı Koalisyonlar Dönemi Mi, Güvenlik Stratejileri, - 2012. 8 (16), 46-85. [in Turkish]

9. Armaoğlu F., Yüzyıl Siyasi Tarihi 1914-1980, Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları. -1987. 20. Р.31-65. [in Turkish]

10. Oran B. Dönemin Bilançosu, Baskın Oran (Der.), Türk Dış Politikası, Cilt II, 3. Baskı, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul. 2002. Р.65-84. [in Turkish]

11. Hacısalihoglu İ. Y., Avrasya Zemininde Şangay İş Birliği Örgütü Ve Türkiye, Jeopolitik, -2004, 3 (9), Р.74-76. [in Turkish]

12. Özlük E. Adil Savaş ve Irak Savaşı: Anakronik Bir Öğretiyi 21. Yüzyılda Yeniden Okumak, Selçuk Ün. İİBF Sos. Ek. Ar. Dergisi, -2015. 15 (30), Р.15-58. [in Turkish]

13. Yalçın H. B ve Duran, B. Suriye’de İç Savaş, Vekalet Ve Yıpratma, Hasan Basri Yalçın-Burhanettin Duran, (Ed.), Küresel Ve Bölgesel Aktörlerin Suriye Stratejileri, Seta Kitapları. -2016. Р.13-44. [in Turkish]

14. Canar B. Soğuk Savaş Sonrasında Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nin Karadeniz Politikası, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, -2012. 67(1), Р. 49-80. [in Turkish]

15. Belov V. A. Kak Rossii i NATO vyjti iz ih nyneshnego tupika? [How can Russia and NATO break out of their current impasse?]. 2020. Erişim adresi: Available at: - URL: https://regnum.ru/article/3135496 [in Russian] (accessed: 13.01.2025)

16. Zamost'yanov A., Velikolepnaya vos'merka: kak byl sozdan protivoves NATO Varshavskij dogovor protivostoyal Severoatlanticheskomu bloku, [The Magnificent Eight: How a Counterweight to NATO Was Created The Warsaw Pact opposed the North Atlantic bloc]. Izvestiya. 2020. Available at: - URL: https://iz.ru/1010265/arseniizamostianov/velikolepnaia-vosmerka-kak-byl-sozdan-protivoves-nato. [in Russian] (accessed: 13.01.2025)

17. NATO Active Engagement, Modern Defence, Strategic Concept 2010, Available at: - URL: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_publications/20120214_strategic-concept-2010-eng.pdf. [in English] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

18. NATO Member Countrie, NATO 2024, 11 Mart. Erişim adresi: Available at: - URL: https://www.nato.int/cps/ru/natohq/topics_52044.htm?selectedLocale=en [in English] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

19. Aksu F.E. NATO’nun Güvenlik Anlayışı ve Stratejik Konseptleri, Güvenlik Yazıları Serisi, 2019. No.23. Available at: - URL: https://trguvenlikportali.com/wp-content/uploads [in Turkish] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

20. NATO Member Countrie, NATO, 2024, 11 Mart. Available at: - URL: https://www.nato.int/cps/ru/natohq/topics_52044.htm?selectedLocale=en [in English] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

21. Cyberpedia. Strategicheskaya koncepciya Severoatlanticheskogo soyuza. [Strategic Concept of the North Atlantic Alliance]. 2017. Available at: - URL: https://cyberpedia.su/11xb556.html [in Russian] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

22. Özer Y. Stratejik Konseptler Bağlamında NATO’nun Stratejik Kültür Dönüşümü, Güvenlik Yazıları Serisi, 2021. No. 58. https://trguvenlikportali.com/wp-content/uploads /2021/05/NATOStratejikKonsept_YusufOzer_v.1.pdf DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24400.43522 [in Turkish] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

23. NATO Strategic Concepts 1968, - 2022, 18 Temmuz. Available at: - URL: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_56626.htm?selectedLocale=en [in English] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

24. Interfaks Putin nazval NATO instrumentom vneshnej politiki SSHA, [Putin called NATO an instrument of US foreign policy]. 2017. Available at: - URL: https://www.interfax.ru/forumspb/565091 [in Russian] (accessed: 23.01.2025)

25. Sibnet.ru. Minoborony naschitalo vokrug Rossii 400 voennyh baz Zapada. 2015. [The Ministry of Defense counted 400 Western military bases around Russia]. Available at: - URL: https://info.sibnet.ru/article/421365/ [in Russian] (accessed: 23.01.2025)

26. Armejskij V. Voennye bazy SSHA i NATO: ih razmery i gde oni nahodyatsya [US and NATO military bases: their sizes and locations] . 2015. Available at: - URL: https://army-news.ru/2015/06/voennye-bazy-ssha-i-nato-ix-razmery-igde-oni-naxodyatsya/ [in Russian] (accessed: 23.01.2025)

27. Abarinov V. Soyuz nerushimyj. NATO ispolnilos' 70 let., (2019). [An unbreakable union. NATO turns 70] Available at: - URL: https://www.svoboda.org/a/29859524.html [in Russian] (accessed: 23.01.2025)

28. Caner E. NATO Yeni Startejik Konsepti, Sun Savunma Net, 2023. Erişim adresi: Available at: - URL: https://www.sunsavunma.net/nato-yeni-stratejik-konsepti/ [in Turkish] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

29. İldem T. NATO Yeni Stratejik Konsepti Nedir Ne Değildir?, Ekonomi ve dış Politikalar araştırma Merkezi, EDAM, 2022. 7(22), Р.1-18. [in Turkish]

30. NATO Strategic Concepts 1991, - 2022, 18 Temmuz. Available at: - URL: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_56626.htm?selectedLocale=en [in English] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

31. NATO Strategic Concepts 1999, - 2022, Available at: - URL: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_56626.htm?selectedLocale=en [in English] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

32. Sovetskaya istoricheskaya enciklopediya. [Soviet Historical Encyclopedia]. Tom 2 — M., Sovetskaya enciklopediya, 1962, P.779-780. [in Russian]

33. ERESHKO A. SHojgu nazval zayavleniya ministra oborony Germanii ‘napadkami uchenicy mladshih klassov’ [Shoigu called the German Defense Minister's statements "attacks by a primary school student"]. TASS. 2020. Available at: - URL: https://tass.ru/politika/10124131?nw=1606712039000. [in Russian] (accessed: 23.01.2025)

34. Strategic Concept 2022, NATO. 2022. Available at: - URL: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/ [in English] (accessed: 03.01.2025)

35. ERESHKO A. SHojgu nazval zayavleniya ministra oborony Germanii ‘napadkami uchenicy mladshih klassov’. [NATO Reform Report: Russia and China Remain Main Rivals Until 2030]. TASS. 2020. Available at: - URL: https://rg.ru/2020/12/02/doklad-o-reforme-nato-do-2030-goda-rf-i-knr-ostaiutsia-glavnymi-sopernikami.html [in Russian] (accessed: 23.01.2025)