READING ABILITY OF YOUNG KAZAKHSTANI ADOLESCENTS IN ENGLISH

The purpose of this brief three-year research study is to assess the reading ability in English, as a foreign language (FL), among eighth-grade learners in Kazakhstan. Reading literacy plays a crucial role in the learning process and increases knowledge of human beings across academic domains (see OECD, 2018). This study examined the reading and literacy skills of eighth-grade students in secondary schools in Pavlodar. The number of participants varied during the computer-based assessment from 2018 to 2020.

The instruments for data collection were online tests in English as a FL administered by the Electronic Diagnostic Assessment System (eDia) and a questionnaire with background items adapted from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) (OECD, 2018). English reading tests have been previously modified and validated (see Nikolov & Csapó, 2010), although additional specific materials on the country's cultural features have been used.

The reliability of the English language tests during the three-year assessment was very high, as measured by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the 8th grade in 2018 (α = 0.96), and in 2019 and 2020 (α = 0.94). The results revealed no significant gender differences in English language test performance among eighth-grade students over three years (p > 0.05). However, the small effect size of the first/native language during the three-year assessment study in eighth grade highlighted the importance of teaching reading skills in English as a foreign language for eighth-grade students in Kazakhstan.

1. Shohamy E. The discourse of language testing as a tool for shaping national, global, and transnational identities. Language and Intercultural Communication. – 2013.Vol. 13(2). P. 225–236.

2. OECD PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. Available at: — URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2015-assessment-and-analytical-framework_9789264281820-en.html (accessed: 15.05.2024).

3. Díaz G., Torres M., Iglesias, J., Mosquera R., Reigosa V., Santos E., Galán L. Changes in Reading Strategies in School-Age Children. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. – 2009. Vol. 12(2), P. 441-453.

4. Mundrake G. A. The evolution of assessment, testing, and evaluation. Assessment in business education, 38, NBEA Yearbook. Reston: NBEA. – 2000. P. 252-262.

5. Bachman L. F. Statistical Analyses for Language Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. – 2004.P. 272-282.

6. Ghaicha A. Theoretical Framework for Educational Assessment: A Synoptic Review. Journal of Education and Practice. – 2016. Vol. 7(24). P. 212-231.

7. MES.Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan. -2016. Available at: — URL: http://www.edu.gov.kz/kz/grazhdanam/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=368 (accessed: 17.04.2024).

8. MES. Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan. – 2013. Available at: — URL: http://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/V17015605_1 (accessed: 16.06.2024).

9. OECD/The World Bank. OECD Reviews of School Resources: Kazakhstan Paris: OECD Publishing. - 2015 Available at: — URL: https://chooser.crossref.org/?doi=10.1787%2F9789264245891-en (accessed: 12.07.2024).

10. OECD, (2023) PISA 2022 Results (Volume I and II) - Country Notes: Kazakhstan. Available at: — URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/kazakhstan_8c403c04-en.html (accessed: 23.10.2025).

11. Scott C. L. The Futures of Learning 3: what kind of pedagogies for the 21st century? – 2015. P. 151-161.

12. Csapó B., Molnár G. Online diagnostic assessment in support of personalized teaching and learning: The eDia System. Frontiers in Psychology. – 2019. P. 89-99.

13. OECD, PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework: Reading, Mathematics and Science, Paris: OECD Publishing. -2018. Available at: — URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-for-development-assessment-and-analytical-framework_9789264305274-en.html (accessed: 06.08.2024).

14. Nikolov, M., & Csapó, B. The relationships between 8th graders‘ L1 and L2 reading skills, inductive reasoning and socio-economic status in early English and German as a foreign language programs. System. – 2018. Vol. 73. P. 48-57.

15. Sagintayeva A., Bridges D., McLaughlin C., Mehisto P., Drummond M. J., Ayubayeva N., Ganimurat N. Development of strategic directions for education reforms in Kazakhstan for vocational and technical education project team. In development of strategic directions for education reforms in Kazakhstan for 2015 – 2020 report. - 2014. Available at: — URL: http://nur.nu.edu.kz/bitstream/handle/123456789/335/DIAGNOSTIC REPORT.pdf (accessed: 18.07.2024).

16. Benmamoun E., Montrul S., Polinsky M. Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical linguistics. -2013. Vol. 39(3-4). P. 129-181.

17. Akhmetova A., Soeharto S., Imambayeva G., Csapó B.. Assessing and validating young Kazakhstanis’ reading skills in English, the impact of classroom climate, and their engagement on reading skills. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. – 2022.Vol. 12(2) P. 280-292.

18. Akhmetova A., Imambayeva G., Csapó B. A study of reading attitude and reading achievement among young learners in middle school. Heliyon. – 2022. Vol. 8(7).

19. Verhoeven L., Snow C. E. (Eds).Literacy and motivation: Reading engagement in individuals and groups. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. – 2001. 98 p.