<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">asu</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Атырауского университета имени Халела Досмухамедова</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Bulletin of the Khalel Dosmukhamedov Atyrau University</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2077-0197</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2790-332X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Атырауский университет имени Халела Досмухамедова</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47649/vau.26.v80.i1.10</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">asu-2709</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПЕДАГОГИКА И ПСИХОЛОГИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PEDAGOGY AND PSYCHOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ВОСПРИИМЧИВОСТЬ СТАРШЕКЛАССНИКОВ К ОБРАТНОЙ СВЯЗИ И ВОСПРИЯТИЕ АВТОМАТИЗИРОВАННЫХ ИНСТРУМЕНТОВ ОЦЕНКИ ПИСЬМЕННЫХ РАБОТ В ЛАТИНСКОЙ АМЕРИКЕ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS' RECEPTIVITY TO FEEDBACK AND PERCEPTIONS OF AUTOMATED WRITING EVALUATION TOOLS IN LATIN AMERICA</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-5977</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бургос Мора</surname><given-names>Л. Э.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Burgos Mora</surname><given-names>L. E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Лаура Элиза Бургос Мора - PhD,</p><p>Гвадалахара, Халиско, 45130</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Laura Elisa Burgos Mora - PhD,</p><p>Guadalajara, Jalisco, 45130</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">laura.burgos@academicos.udg.mx</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6642-4381</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Валле Сервантес</surname><given-names>Л. Ж.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Valle Cervantes</surname><given-names>L. G.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Луис Жерардо Валле Сервантес - PhD,</p><p>Гвадалахара, Халиско, 45130</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Luis Gerardo Valle Cervantes - PhD,</p><p>Guadalajara, Jalisco, 45130</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">gerardo.valle@academico.udg.mx</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5905-2558</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Муньоз</surname><given-names>С. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Muñoz</surname><given-names>S. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Сью Алисия Муньоз - М.Э.д.,</p><p>Гвадалахара, Халиско, 45130</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Sue Alicia Muñoz- M.Ed.,</p><p>Guadalajara, Jalisco, 45130</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">sue.munoz8383@academicos.udg.mx</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Университет Гвадалахары<country>Мексика</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">University of Guadalajara<country>Mexico</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>05</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>80</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>113</fpage><lpage>129</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Бургос Мора Л.Э., Валле Сервантес Л.Ж., Муньоз С.А., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Бургос Мора Л.Э., Валле Сервантес Л.Ж., Муньоз С.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Burgos Mora L.E., Valle Cervantes L.G., Muñoz S.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://asu.ejournal.kz/jour/article/view/2709">https://asu.ejournal.kz/jour/article/view/2709</self-uri><abstract><p>В данном исследовании изучается восприимчивость старшеклассников в Латинской Америке к обратной связи, особенно в контексте изучения английского языка как иностранного. Цель статьи заключается в исследовании восприимчивости старшеклассников Латинской Америки к обратной связи при изучении английского языка как иностранного, включая оценку их отношения к автоматизированным инструментам проверки письменных работ (AWE). Исследуется, как учащиеся воспринимают обратную связь и реагируют на нее, с акцентом на использовании автоматизированных инструментов оценки письменных работ (AWE). Исследование восполняет пробелы в литературе, изучая группу населения, которая в значительной степени оставалась без внимания — старшеклассников в Латинской Америке — и анализируя восприятие учащимися инструментов AWE и их восприимчивость к обратной связи. В исследовании используется смешанный подход, сочетающий количественные данные из анкет и качественные данные из трех открытых вопросов анкеты. Ключевые результаты показывают, что учащиеся восприимчивы к обратной связи, но не проявляют к ней активного участия на поведенческом уровне. Хотя они положительно относятся к инструментам AWE и положительно их воспринимают, их использование происходит редко. Учащиеся в целом предпочитают персонализированную обратную связь от учителей автоматизированным инструментам, хотя существует потенциал для повышения эффективности и принятия инструментов AWE. Исследование не выявило статистически значимых различий в восприимчивости к обратной связи в зависимости от возраста, пола или уровня владения языком, при этом размеры эффекта были незначительными во всех сравнениях.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This study explores the receptivity of high school students in Latin America to Feedback, particularly in the context of learning English as a foreign language. It investigates how students perceive and respond to feedback, focusing on the use of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) tools. The purpose of the article is to study the susceptibility of Latin American high school students to feedback when learning English as a foreign language, including an assessment of their attitude to automated written work verification tools (AWE). The research addresses gaps in the literature by examining a largely overlooked population—high school students in Latin America—and by analyzing students' perceptions of AWE tools and their receptivity to feedback. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data from questionnaires and qualitative insights from three open-ended questionnaire items. Key findings reveal that students are receptive to feedback but do not engage behaviorally with it. Although they have a positive attitude toward and perception of AWE tools, their use is low. Students generally prefer personalized feedback from teachers over automated tools, though there is potential to improve the effectiveness and acceptance of AWE tools. The study found no statistically significant differences in feedback receptivity based on age, gender, or language proficiency, with negligible effect sizes across all comparisons.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>восприимчивость к обратной связи</kwd><kwd>автоматизированная оценка письменных работ</kwd><kwd>английский как иностранный язык</kwd><kwd>механизмы обратной связи</kwd><kwd>развитие навыков письма</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Feedback Receptivity</kwd><kwd>Automated Writing Evaluation</kwd><kwd>English as a Foreign Language</kwd><kwd>Feedback Mechanisms</kwd><kwd>Writing Skills Development</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dabboub A.E. The effectiveness of comprehensive corrective feedback-direct and indirect-on EFL learners’ language accuracy, structural complexity and lexical diversity: Doctoral dissertation. - 2019. –Р. 17–37.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dabboub A.E. The effectiveness of comprehensive corrective feedback-direct and indirect-on EFL learners’ language accuracy, structural complexity and lexical diversity: Doctoral dissertation. - 2019. Р. 17–37. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bitchener J., Storch N. Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters, - 2016. – Р. 25-28.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bitchener J., Storch N. Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters, - 2016. Р. 25-28. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ellis R. A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective Feedback // Stud Second Lang Acquis. - 2010. –Т. 32, № 2. –Р. 335–349.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ellis R. A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective Feedback // Stud Second Lang Acquis. - 2010. Т. 32, № 2. Р. 335–349. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Carless D., Winstone N. Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy // Teaching in Higher Education. Routledge, - 2023. Т. 28, № 1. – Р. 150–163.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carless D., Winstone N. Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy // Teaching in Higher Education. Routledge, - 2023. Т. 28, № 1. Р. 150–163. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chong S.W. Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective // Assess Eval High Educ. Routledge, - 2021. – Т. 46, № 1. –Р. 92–104.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chong S.W. Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective // Assess Eval High Educ. Routledge, - 2021. Т. 46, № 1. Р. 92–104. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Winstone N.E. и др. Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes // Educational Psychologist. Routledge, - 2017. Т. 52, № 1. – Р. 17–37.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Winstone N.E. и др. Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes // Educational Psychologist. Routledge, - 2017. Т. 52, № 1. Р. 17–37. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lv X., Ren W., Xie Y. The Effects of Online Feedback on ESL/EFL Writing: A Meta-Analysis // Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. Springer, - 2021. –Т. 30. –№ 6. –Р. 643–653.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lv X., Ren W., Xie Y. The Effects of Online Feedback on ESL/EFL Writing: A Meta-Analysis // AsiaPacific Education Researcher. Springer, - 2021. Т. 30, № 6. Р. 643–653. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wahyuni S. The Effect of Different Feedback on Writing Quality of College Students with Different Cognitive Styles // Dinamika Ilmu. UINSI Samarinda, - 2017. – Р. 39–58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wahyuni S. The Effect of Different Feedback on Writing Quality of College Students with Different Cognitive Styles // Dinamika Ilmu. UINSI Samarinda, - 2017. Р. 39–58. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bitchener J., Young S., Cameron D. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing // J Second Lang Writ. - 2005. –Т. 14, № 3. –Р. 191–205.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bitchener J., Young S., Cameron D. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing // J Second Lang Writ. - 2005. Т. 14, № 3. Р. 191–205. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zeevy-Solovey O. Comparing peer, ChatGPT, and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing: Students’ perceptions and preferences // Technology in Language Teaching &amp; Learning. Castledown Publishers. - 2024. –Т. 6, № 3. –Р. 1–23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zeevy-Solovey O. Comparing peer, ChatGPT, and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing: Students’ perceptions and preferences // Technology in Language Teaching &amp; Learning. Castledown Publishers. - 2024. Т. 6, № 3. Р. 1–23. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Roach S.J. Feedback in context: a case study of students’ perceptions of the role, value, and use of instructor feedback in a college writing course: Doctoral dissertation thesis. Dekalb: Northern Illinois University. - 2023. №8. – Р. 17–30.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Roach S.J. Feedback in context: a case study of students’ perceptions of the role, value, and use of instructor feedback in a college writing course: Doctoral dissertation thesis. Dekalb: Northern Illinois University. - 2023. №8. Р. 17–30. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van der Kleij F.M., Lipnevich A.A. Student perceptions of assessment feedback: a critical scoping review and call for research // Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. Springer Science and Business Media B.V., - 2021. – Т. 33, № 2. – Р. 345–373.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van der Kleij F.M., Lipnevich A.A. Student perceptions of assessment feedback: a critical scoping review and call for research // Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. Springer Science and Business Media B.V., - 2021. Т. 33, № 2. Р. 345–373. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kluger A.N., Denisi A. The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory // Psychological Bulletin. - 1996–. Т. 9, № 2. – Р. 254– 284.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kluger A.N., Denisi A. The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a MetaAnalysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory // Psychological Bulletin. - 1996. Т. 9, № 2. Р. 254–284. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Panadero E., Lipnevich A.A. A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements // Educational Research Review. Elsevier Ltd, - 2022. –Т. 35. –Р. 254–284.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Panadero E., Lipnevich A.A. A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements // Educational Research Review. Elsevier Ltd, - 2022. Т. 35. Р. 254–284. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lipnevich A.A., Berg D.A.G., Smith J.K. Toward a model of students' response to feedback // Hand Human and Social Conditions in Assessment / под ред. Brown G.T.L., Harris L.R. New York: Routledge, - 2016. – Р. 196–185.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lipnevich A.A., Berg D.A.G., Smith J.K. Toward a model of students' response to feedback // Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment / под ред. Brown G.T.L., Harris L.R. New York: Routledge, - 2016. Р. 196–185. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Carless D., Boud D. The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback // Assess Eval High Educ. Routledge, - 2018. –Т. 43, № 8. – Р. 1315–1325.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carless D., Boud D. The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback // Assess Eval High Educ. Routledge, - 2018. Т. 43, № 8. Р. 1315–1325. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lipnevich A.A., Lopera-Oquendo C. Receptivity to Instructional Feedback: A Validation Study in the Secondary School Context in Singapore // European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Hogrefe Publishing GmbH, - 2024. Т. 40, № 1. –Р. 22–32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lipnevich A.A., Lopera-Oquendo C. Receptivity to Instructional Feedback: A Validation Study in the Secondary School Context in Singapore // European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Hogrefe Publishing GmbH, - 2024. Т. 40, № 1. Р. 22–32. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lipnevich A.A. и др. Development of a measure of receptivity to instructional feedback and examination of its links to personality // Pers Individ Dif. Elsevier Ltd, - 2021. –169 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lipnevich A.A. и др. Development of a measure of receptivity to instructional feedback and examination of its links to personality // Pers Individ Dif. Elsevier Ltd, - 2021. Т. 169 р. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lipnevich A.A., Smith J.K. Student – Feedback Interaction Model: Revised // Studies in Educational Evaluation. Elsevier Ltd, - 2022. – №75. – 25 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lipnevich A.A., Smith J.K. Student – Feedback Interaction Model: Revised // Studies in Educational Evaluation. Elsevier Ltd, - 2022. №75. 25 р. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Luca Bahr J. и др. Receptivity to Instructional Computer-Based Feedback (RIF): A Multistudy Validation of a German RIF Scale // European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Hogrefe Publishing GmbH, - 2024. №42, № 2. Р.167-178.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Luca Bahr J. и др. Receptivity to Instructional Computer-Based Feedback (RIF): A Multistudy Validation of a German RIF Scale // European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Hogrefe Publishing GmbH, - 2024. №42, № 2. Р.167-178. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Godwin-Jones R. Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning // Language Learning &amp; Technology. - 2022. –№ 2. – 26 р</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Godwin-Jones R. Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning // Language Learning &amp; Technology. - 2022. № 2. 26р. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fu H., Liu X. EFL Learner Engagement in Automatic Written Evaluation // Front Psychol. Frontiers Media S.A. - 2022. Т. 13-р</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fu H., Liu X. EFL Learner Engagement in Automatic Written Evaluation // Front Psychol. Frontiers Media S.A. - 2022. 13 р. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wang J., Ke X. Integrating Machine Translation Into EFL Writing Instruction: Process, Product and Perception // Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Academy Publication, 2022. –Т. 13, № 1. –Р. 125–137.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wang J., Ke X. Integrating Machine Translation Into EFL Writing Instruction: Process, Product and Perception // Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Academy Publication, 2022. Т. 13, № 1. Р. 125–137. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shang H.F. Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance // Interactive Learning Environments. Routledge, - 2022. – Т. 30, № 1. –Р. 4–16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shang H.F. Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance // Interactive Learning Environments. Routledge, - 2022. Т. 30, № 1. Р. 4–16. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sisquiarco A., Sánchez Rojas S., Abad J.V. Influence of Strategies-Based Feedback in Students’ Oral Performance // HOW. Asociacion Colombiana de Profesores de Ingles - ASOCOPI, - 2018. –Т. 25. –№ 1. – Р. 93– 113.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sisquiarco A., Sánchez Rojas S., Abad J.V. Influence of Strategies-Based Feedback in Students’ Oral Performance // HOW. Asociacion Colombiana de Profesores de Ingles - ASOCOPI, - 2018. Т. 25, № 1. Р. 93–113. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Geng J., Razali A.B. Effectiveness of the Automated Writing Evaluation Program on Improving Undergraduates’ Writing Performance // English Language Teaching. Canadian Center of Science and Education, - 2022. Т. 15, № 7. 49 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Geng J., Razali A.B. Effectiveness of the Automated Writing Evaluation Program on Improving Undergraduates’ Writing Performance // English Language Teaching. Canadian Center of Science and Education, - 2022. Т. 15, № 7. 49 р. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mayordomo R.M. и др. Perception of online feedback and its impact on cognitive and emotional engagement with feedback // Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). Springer. - 2022. Т. 27, № 6. Р. 7947–7971.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mayordomo R.M. и др. Perception of online feedback and its impact on cognitive and emotional engagement with feedback // Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). Springer. - 2022. Т. 27, № 6. Р. 7947–7971. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lipnevich A.A., Lopera-Oquendo C. Receptivity to Instructional Feedback: Technical Manual. - 2023. –№ 4. –Р. 794–797.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lipnevich A.A., Lopera-Oquendo C. Receptivity to Instructional Feedback: Technical Manual. - 2023. № 4. Р. 794–797. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nguyen H., Xiong W., Litman D. Iterative Design and Classroom Evaluation of Automated Formative Feedback for Improving Peer Feedback Localization // Int J Artif Intell Educ. Springer New York LLC, - 2017. –27, № 3. – Р. 582–622.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nguyen H., Xiong W., Litman D. Iterative Design and Classroom Evaluation of Automated Formative Feedback for Improving Peer Feedback Localization // Int J Artif Intell Educ. Springer New York LLC, - 2017. Т. 27, № 3. Р. 582–622. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Creswell J. W., Plano Clark V. L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. - 2017. –496 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Creswell J. W., Plano Clark V. L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. - 2017. 496 р. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology // Qualitative Research in Psychology. - 2006. Vol. 3, no. 2. P. 77–101.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology // Qualitative Research in Psychology. - 2006. Vol. 3, no. 2. P. 77–101. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Corbin J., Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. - 2014. –456 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Corbin J., Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. - 2014. - 456 p. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McDonald N., Schoenebeck S., Forte A. Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research // Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. - 2019. Vol. 3, no. CSCW. – P. 1–20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McDonald N., Schoenebeck S., Forte A. Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research // Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. - 2019. Vol. 3, no. CSCW. P. 1–20. [in English]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
